Skip to content

ChatGPT integration #2153

Closed
Closed

Description

@aehlke

I'd love to be able to move a codex session over to ChatGPT to brainstorm and use web search features and so on in a nice UI when I'm just trying to research a task and experiment with ideas. And then bring the result of that (or of a chat I started in ChatGPT) into codex CLI easily so that I can then prompt it to take action based on that context.

Ideally this would be seamless with the macOS app.

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Request: Allow me to send chats/context to ChatGPT app and back[/-] [+]ChatGPT integration[/+] on Nov 15, 2025
  2. marked From ChatGPT to Codex #5340 as a duplicate of this issue on Nov 15, 2025
  3. ChazWinterYT commented on Jan 8, 2026

    @ChazWinterYT

    Why do you love this discussion-less thread so much? You keep shutting down discussion to link your favorite thread. I guess it's easier than actually working on the solution.

  4. etraut-openai commented on Jan 8, 2026

    @etraut-openai
    Contributor

    @ChazWinterYT, we generally use upvotes to inform prioritization on the Codex team. If there are a dozen open issues that all speak to roughly the same feature, it dilutes the signal. This thread already has many upvotes, so if you'd like to discuss this feature, please comment in this thread rather than creating a new one.

  5. aehlke commented on Jan 8, 2026

    @aehlke
    Author

    Note that now my biggest use case for this would be to seamlessly bring the 5.2 Pro model in for helping with a Codex session, or for brainstorming with Pro first and then bringing that to Codex (so, either direction)

  6. itsjavi commented on Jan 27, 2026

    @itsjavi

    Bringing chats and projects from ChatGPT to Codex and vice-versa is essential. Right now the only way to do that is manually transcribing everything to bring it back and forth as context. Not ideal (and very time consuming) but it works.

    I thought that once I am logged-in, Codex (VSCode ext.) would have access to my past ChatGPT chats and projects, but it doesn't. I have a full project where I am designing something new technically and ChatGPT offers me the kind of brainstorming (voice included) that Codex can't, that's why I use both and constantly switch back and forth but the UX would be much better if they are able to work together.

    That's why both are needed to work more closely together IMHO.

  7. ashe0047 commented on Jan 27, 2026

    @ashe0047

    Bringing chats and projects from ChatGPT to Codex and vice-versa is essential. Right now the only way to do that is manually transcribing everything to bring it back and forth as context. Not ideal (and very time consuming) but it works.

    I thought that once I am logged-in, Codex (VSCode ext.) would have access to my past ChatGPT chats and projects, but it doesn't. I have a full project where I am designing something new technically and ChatGPT offers me the kind of brainstorming (voice included) that Codex can't, that's why I use both and constantly switch back and forth but the UX would be much better if they are able to work together.

    That's why both are needed to work more closely together IMHO.

    Yes. I agree, i also brainstorm in ChatGPT but have no way of having that context in codex seamlessly. Did you manually copy and paste between them to include the context in codex?

  8. mpettit2253 commented on Jan 27, 2026

    @mpettit2253

    Just merge the memory/context of all of your products already. As users, we are here for the extended, long-form intelligence and memory that ChatGPT gives us. The fact that Codex, Images, ChatGPT and Pulse aren't just modalities of a common memory is a recipe for falling behind. Asking ChatGPT or a Pulse suggestion to go off and create a prototype is just natural. You shouldn't need upvotes to put this as number 1 on the feature sheet.

  9. raphaelrk commented on Feb 8, 2026

    @raphaelrk

    If this gets implemented, it would be nice if it didn't automatically happen, but was something I could opt into on a session-by-session basis.

  10. kt-devoss commented on Feb 9, 2026

    @kt-devoss

    +1
    Interesting proposal! — I’d love this integration too!!

    This would be especially helpful when I’m away from my dev setup (e.g., on the go, or even while traveling) — I often want to research and brainstorm in ChatGPT’s UI first(nice UI/UX, web search, etc.) , then later hand off the resulting context to Codex to execute when I’m back at a terminal/IDE.

    I tried a workable stopgap with what we have today.
    The ChatGPT → Codex direction is partially doable in a semi-automated way:

    • export your ChatGPT data (Select Settings → Data Controls → Export Data.)
    • extract the text for a single target conversation from conversations.json (easy with a small script),
    • and then paste/feed that text into Codex as context.
      (cont...)
  11. 25 remaining items

  12. EARTHTOEDWARD commented on Apr 17, 2026

    @EARTHTOEDWARD

    Adding a concrete use case here instead of opening another duplicate.

    Uploaded Codex CLI feedback thread ID: 019d9a46-fe44-7491-91dc-7690b2298431

    What I want is not just generic integration, but an intentional handoff flow in both directions:

    • start in ordinary ChatGPT when I am still exploring / researching / shaping the problem
    • promote that conversation into a Codex thread without manual copy/paste cleanup
    • keep a durable link between the ChatGPT discussion and the Codex thread
    • later query progress, summaries, and artifacts back from that same shared object

    I am not asking for raw transcript mirroring. An explicit handoff capsule would be a much better design:

    • selected context
    • goals / constraints
    • linked artifacts
    • one durable reference that both ChatGPT and Codex understand

    Related public discussion:
    https://community.openai.com/t/feature-request-native-chatgpt-codex-thread-bridge/1379162

  13. shawnholt commented on May 7, 2026

    @shawnholt

    i can't beleive there is no movement on this.... hope it is soon. copy / paste is brain-dead.

  14. LeonardoDaviti commented on Jun 2, 2026

    @LeonardoDaviti

    Still no progress???

  15. aehlke commented on Jun 3, 2026

    @aehlke
    Author

    Still no progress???

    they announced that the codex app is going away and will be consolidated into chatgpt. so wait for that to see.

  16. LeonardoDaviti commented on Jun 4, 2026

    @LeonardoDaviti

    yeah instead of integrating chatgpt into codex, codex should be merged into chatgpt. this will increase the codex usage more and agentic AI will be on default for all chatgpt app users.

  17. chipverifpro commented on Jun 21, 2026

    @chipverifpro

    they announced that the codex app is going away and will be consolidated into chatgpt. so wait for that to see.

    Hopefully when they merge the two apps, they will have figured out how to merge the history, something they've not been able to do for 9 months according to this thread.

  18. math-wil commented on Jul 8, 2026

    @math-wil

    Adding a related reference, not an official OpenAI solution and not a proposed Codex PR: a friend pointed me to this independent MCP bridge that explores a similar workflow: https://github.com/velhud/PatchBay
    It seems to cover part of this workflow: ChatGPT can coordinate local Codex CLI workers and receive reports/diffs/results back in the chat.

  19. aehlke commented on Jul 9, 2026

    @aehlke
    Author

    Still no progress???

    they announced that the codex app is going away and will be consolidated into chatgpt. so wait for that to see.

    like I said - it happened today

  20. aehlke commented on Jul 9, 2026

    @aehlke
    Author

    Solved in today's update now that they've replaced ChatGPT with Codex:

    Image
  21. ignatremizov commented on Jul 9, 2026

    @ignatremizov

    And so the monkey's paw finger curls... ChatGPT Work quota is shared with Codex quota 😔

    Image
  22. aehlke commented on Jul 10, 2026

    @aehlke
    Author

    @ignatremizov Chats are not though. nothing changed

  23. Vishnu0007-svj commented on Jul 10, 2026

    @Vishnu0007-svj

    Big +1. I'm constantly doing this. There should be a very easy way of saying to Codex:

    Look at this ChatGPT conversation thread, perhaps emphasizing last messages. I want to implement what's described here ...

    Currently I'm creating a shared link for the ChatGPT conversation thread, which I then give to Codex. But I think that's really not ideal, because then Codex attempts to curl the chat thread, which probably is not in an ideal format for it to consume. There really should be an easy way for Codex to consume ChatGPT conversations, with the ability to prioritize certain messages (so it doesn't fill context)

    Ohh I see can you tell something about a recent task where you faces this problem??

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions