Skip to content

Pro $100 (5x) plan is rate-limited as plus on Codex Desktop — access_token has plan_type=prolite but the responses API returns X-Codex-Plan-Type=plus #29243

Open

Description

@he15605538002-create

What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?

26.616.41845 (core 0.142.0-alpha.6)

What subscription do you have?

ChatGPT Pro — $100 / 5x tier

What platform is your computer?

Darwin 25.5.0 arm64 arm (macOS 26.5.1)

What issue are you seeing?

My subscription is ChatGPT Pro ($100 "5x" tier). The ChatGPT web Codex shows the
correct Pro usage allowance for this account. But when I use Codex Desktop (ChatGPT
login, calling the /v1 responses API), the server rate-limits me as "plus" and
repeatedly returns 429 usage_limit_reached, even though the account is barely used.

The key inconsistency, on the same request:

  • The OAuth access_token my client sends to https://api.openai.com/v1 carries the
    claim: chatgpt_plan_type = "prolite" (the Pro 5x tier — correct)
  • The rate-limit response header for that same request returns:
    X-Codex-Plan-Type = "plus"

Exact error (HTTP 429), PII removed:
{
"type": "error",
"error": {
"type": "usage_limit_reached",
"message": "The usage limit has been reached",
"plan_type": "plus"
},
"status_code": 429
}
Response headers:
X-Codex-Plan-Type: plus
X-Codex-Active-Limit: premium
X-Codex-Primary-Used-Percent: 100 (5-hour window, 300 min)
X-Codex-Secondary-Used-Percent: 42 (weekly window, 10080 min)
X-Codex-Credits-Balance: 0

So OpenAI's own token says "prolite" while OpenAI's own rate limiter treats the
request as "plus".

What steps can reproduce the bug?

  1. Be on the ChatGPT Pro $100 (5x) plan, i.e. plan_type "prolite" (mine activated
    the day before this started).
  2. Sign in to Codex Desktop using ChatGPT login (auth_mode=Chatgpt; originator=
    Codex_Desktop; wire_api=responses).
  3. Run a few turns with model gpt-5.5.
  4. Within a small number of requests the 5-hour "premium" window reports
    X-Codex-Primary-Used-Percent: 100 and the API returns 429 usage_limit_reached
    with X-Codex-Plan-Type: plus.
  5. At the same time, open Codex on the web for the same account — it shows the
    correct Pro allowance and is not exhausted.

Context: the account had only ~30 total requests over a week, yet the 5-hour
window is pinned at 100% while the weekly window is only at 42% — consistent with
"plus"-sized 5-hour limits being applied instead of Pro 5x. (Session ID and token/
context usage can be provided privately on request.)

What is the expected behavior?

A Pro $100 (5x) account (plan_type "prolite") should receive Pro 5x Codex usage
limits (5x of Plus) on the Codex Desktop / responses-API path, and the rate-limit
header should reflect the Pro tier — not "plus". Behavior should match what the
ChatGPT web Codex already shows for the same account.

Additional information

  • This is purely on the Codex responses-API rate-limiter path. Web Codex shows the
    correct Pro quota for the same account, so the subscription/entitlement itself is
    correct — only the Codex rate limiter mis-maps the tier.
  • Re-authenticating does not help: a fresh access_token still correctly carries
    chatgpt_plan_type=prolite, and the API still returns X-Codex-Plan-Type=plus.
  • This may be a recognition/sync gap for the newly introduced Pro $100 (5x /
    "prolite") tier on the Codex rate limiter. If it is a known propagation delay for
    new Pro accounts, please confirm the expected timeline.
  • Possibly related to existing "phantom usage limit" reports (capacity healthy on
    web/status, but CLI/Desktop still returns usage_limit_reached).

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething isn't working
    rate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting
    on Jun 20, 2026
  2. sannmizu commented on Jun 20, 2026

    @sannmizu

    yes, I have same problem. first I update to plus, the codex desktop show free. then I update to pro, the app show pro but I can't continue use it.

  3. chengfengfengwang commented on Jun 21, 2026

    @chengfengfengwang

    I upgraded from Plus to Pro, but it still shows Plus here, and more importantly, it’s completely unusable.

    Image
  4. Necmttn commented on Jun 21, 2026

    @Necmttn

    This needs a plan-resolution receipt on the failing request. Capture non-secret fields: account id hash, client surface/version, access-token plan claim, server-resolved X-Codex-Plan-Type, active limit window id, model, request id, and response timestamp.

    Then support can tell whether Desktop sent the right identity but the quota service resolved plus, or whether the client is using stale auth/account state. Without that split, users only see contradictory "Pro token, plus limiter" evidence.


    Generated with ax.

  5. duynguyenbui commented on Jun 23, 2026

    @duynguyenbui

    Why don’t they make an official announcement instead of doing this?

  6. he15605538002-create commented on Jun 23, 2026

    @he15605538002-create
    Author
  7. a851831151-bot commented on Aug 12, 2026

    @a851831151-bot

    Same issue here. I'm on the ChatGPT Pro $100 (5x) tier.

    Symptoms:

    • Codex Desktop on Windows, app version 26.803.81509
    • Cloud threads return "Request failed with status 429" all day since 11:00 AM (GMT+8), more than 6 hours now
    • Local threads work fine on the same account
    • Web Codex (chatgpt.com) works fine in the afternoon, showing correct Pro quota
    • Weekly quota shows 63% remaining in the Usage page, so the account is clearly not exhausted
    • Re-login (logout/login) did NOT help — Cloud still 429, Local still works
    • Switching VPN node did NOT help
    • No 429 records found in local logs (logs_2.sqlite), the Cloud request path is UI-level only

    This matches exactly the plan-type mapping bug described in this issue: Pro 5x (prolite) account is being rate-limited as "plus" on the Cloud/Desktop path, and the 5-hour window appears pinned at 100% with no reset.

    Please fix this on the server side and reset the affected accounts' usage. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    appIssues related to the Codex desktop appbugSomething isn't workingrate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions