Skip to content

Weekly allowance reaches its limit much sooner after reset despite using the same model #45633

Open

Description

@MrDunum9

Summary

After my weekly Codex / ChatGPT Work allowance resets, I now reach the usage limit noticeably sooner than I did previously. I use exactly the same model before and after the change.

This report concerns the weekly allowance, rather than the five-hour window or a conversation's context capacity.

Confirmed observations

  • The weekly allowance has reset before the faster depletion is observed.
  • I reach the usage limit noticeably sooner in the new weekly window compared with previous usage.
  • The model used before and after is identical.

Details not yet recorded

The exact model label, affected client/version, reset date and time, whether the reset was scheduled or redeemed/purchased, reasoning effort, Fast setting, and before/after usage measurements are not yet included. Comparable task volume and context size have not been established. Please do not infer that all of these variables were unchanged or that I purchased a reset.

This is a qualitative user observation, not a measured claim of a specific multiplier or proof of a billing/accounting fault.

Investigation requested

Please advise how to submit account-specific diagnostics privately, and investigate whether:

  1. The full expected weekly entitlement was restored.
  2. Any entitlement or metering changes could explain the difference.
  3. Unexpected background usage or a usage-accounting issue contributed to the faster depletion.

If abnormal deductions are confirmed, please review whether the affected allowance can be restored.

Related reports

These have similar symptoms; I am not claiming a confirmed shared root cause.

中文说明

我的每周额度重置后,现在明显比以前更快达到使用上限。前后使用的模型完全相同。请核查周额度是否完整恢复、计量规则是否有变化,以及是否存在异常后台消耗或额度扣减问题,并告知如何通过私密渠道补交账户诊断资料。

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething isn't working
    rate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting
    on Sep 15, 2026
  2. github-actions commented on Sep 15, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

    Powered by Codex Action

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't workingrate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions