You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's a cool tool, but looks unmaintained for some time. Now, personally, I believe that sqlmap would profit from using same logic inside (detecting backend WAFs), but I am also scared that it would be too strenuous to maintain along with other stuff.
IMO, I am for (new from glance) implementation into our code (code from there uses it's custom connection wrappers) using "testing vectors" from there - slow implementation with LOW priority.
p.s. an idea of using a modular approach like in "tamper scripts" comes to my mind ;)
Added new switch --identify-waf. Principle is similar as with --tamper. All scripts from waf directory are run against the target to identify the WAF/IDS/IPS product. Currently there are 16 of those implemented. Big thanks goes to @whenov ;)
Added new switch |--identify-waf|. Principle is similar as with
|--tamper|. All scripts from |./waf| directories are run against the
target to identify the WAF/IDS/IPS product. Currently there are 16 of
those implemented. Big thanks goes to @whenov https://github.com/whenov ;)
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #290 (comment).
Activity
stamparm commentedon Dec 12, 2012
It's a cool tool, but looks unmaintained for some time. Now, personally, I believe that sqlmap would profit from using same logic inside (detecting backend WAFs), but I am also scared that it would be too strenuous to maintain along with other stuff.
IMO, I am for (new from glance) implementation into our code (code from there uses it's custom connection wrappers) using "testing vectors" from there - slow implementation with LOW priority.
p.s. an idea of using a modular approach like in "tamper scripts" comes to my mind ;)
antisnatchor commentedon Dec 13, 2012
It is unmaintained Miro, you're right.
Implementing new code, maybe partially based on waffit techniques would be better IMHO.
Update for an Issue #290 (adding tamper-like scripts into (new) direc…
Finalizing implementation for an Issue #290
Minor refactoring for an Issue #290
Unhidding switch '--identify-waf' (Issue #290)
Update for an doc/THANKS (Issue #290)
stamparm commentedon Feb 21, 2013
Added new switch
--identify-waf. Principle is similar as with--tamper. All scripts fromwafdirectory are run against the target to identify the WAF/IDS/IPS product. Currently there are 16 of those implemented. Big thanks goes to @whenov ;)stamparm commentedon Feb 21, 2013
p.s. all requests in this checking are cached so there are no unnecessary requests going on.
antisnatchor commentedon Feb 21, 2013
Nice one ;-)
I will try it soon.
champ1 commentedon Feb 21, 2013
fucking great..:)
I look forward too auto use tamper script based on waf output.. hehe
Thx guys..:)
Minor update for an Issue #290
stamparm commentedon Feb 26, 2013
There was a "bug" involved prior to commit f6b43b4 in "Set-Cookie" based WAF scripts. Now fixed.
stamparm commentedon Feb 27, 2013
kirtixs commentedon Feb 27, 2013
Wow, very nice :)