[efraespada]

Bugbot now requires version-matched dependency type evidence and a supported fault path before claiming that an exception escapes a typed catch. This helps prevent false positives while preserving reports of genuine uncaught wrappers and swallowed cancellation.

What changed

• Added shared dependency type and fault evidence guidance to production reviews and the real-agent benchmark.
• Added nine regression cases covering resolved subclasses, unavailable or stale hierarchy evidence, uncaught wrappers, misleading mocks, and swallowed cancellation.
• Updated the quality corpus to 59 cases and synchronized the specification, catalog, and operator documentation.
• Recorded a six-case model comparison with its limits: both runs had zero false positives and negatives, while only the corrected run passed the exact-location threshold.

Validation

• The author reports 772 Jest suites and 14,100 passing tests, with 35 existing skips; global and module budgets and setup acceptance passed.
• The author reports all 267 extension tests passed at 100% in four metrics, and the local patch audit found zero misses or uncovered changed branches.
• The author reports types, lint, specification/catalog and documentation checks, Graphify, full build, package validation, and CLI, typed API, and local web smoke checks passed.
• The author reports the six-case product-runtime comparison had zero false positives and negatives in both samples; the baseline missed one exact location, and the corrected sample passed all default thresholds. The sample does not reproduce the historical false positive or establish statistical improvement.

Review notes

• The checked-in model comparison is a small sample and does not independently rerun the consumer's resolved JAR or PostgreSQL fault receipts.

Closes #736

[docs-page]

To preview the documentation for this pull request, visit the following URL:

docs.page/vypdev/copilot~756

Documentation is deployed and generated using docs.page

[vypbot]

Bugbot: review complete

Current status: No active findings on d038630.

Pull request · Verified commit · Workflow run

[vypbot]

Copilot approval · Human review needed

Status: A protected workflow, policy, or trust-boundary file changed.
Completed: 1/1 observed checks succeeded; Bugbot complete.
Action required: Ask a human reviewer to decide.
Impact: No new approval is confirmed for this revision.
See checks

Technical evidence

Revision: d038630b9568; base: cc8b5cc0cc39; reason: protected-path.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.79%. Comparing base (5b3664f) to head (d038630).
⚠️ Report is 34 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #756      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    94.50%   94.79%   +0.28%     
===========================================
  Files         1035     1078      +43     
  Lines        33299    34857    +1558     
  Branches      9824    10354     +530     
===========================================
+ Hits         31468    33041    +1573     
+ Misses         699      684      -15     
  Partials      1132     1132              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/prompts/bugbot.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/tooling/bugbot_benchmark_runner.ts	77.77% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 31 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.