Skip to content

fix: ground Kotlin/Wasm reviews in generated parameter scope - #778

Merged
efraespada merged 1 commit into
developfrom
bugfix/764-bugbot-false-positive-kotlinwasm-js-parameters-are-valid-generated-javascript-bindings
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

efraespada merged 1 commit into
developfrom
bugfix/764-bugbot-false-positive-kotlinwasm-js-parameters-are-valid-generated-javascript-bindings

Conversation

@efraespada

@efraespada efraespada commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Bugbot now accounts for Kotlin/Wasm js(...) parameters as generated JavaScript bindings, including parameters captured by nested callbacks. This reduces false positives while preserving findings for genuinely missing identifiers and invalid bridges.

What changed

  • Added shared Kotlin/Wasm binding guidance to ordinary, partitioned, and benchmark reviews.
  • Added six paired corpus scenarios and deterministic regressions for valid parameter bindings, missing identifiers, delivery, scoring, and changed-line anchors.
  • Updated Bugbot guidance, quality documentation, specifications, and generated runtime bundles together; compacted existing Compose guidance while retaining its semantic and prompt-size constraints.

Validation

  • Three delivery regressions failed before the change; 123 focused tests and the 83-case reference/scorer contract passed afterward.
  • Full coverage passed: 773 Jest suites, 14,195 tests passed, 35 skipped, and 267 extension tests passed. Global and module coverage budgets passed; extension coverage was 100%.
  • Build, typecheck, lint, specification, documentation/workflow, dependency-audit, extension reproducibility, npm package, and CLI/API/local-web smoke checks passed.
  • Local server tests were run with localhost access after restricted sandboxing rejected socket creation.

Closes #764

…enerated-javascript-bindings: ground Kotlin Wasm reviews in generated parameter scope
@docs-page

docs-page Bot commented Oct 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

To preview the documentation for this pull request, visit the following URL:

docs.page/vypdev/copilot~778

Documentation is deployed and generated using docs.page

@vypbot
vypbot self-requested a review October 29, 2026 01:15
@vypbot vypbot added this to vypdev Oct 29, 2026
@vypbot vypbot moved this to In Progress in vypdev Oct 29, 2026
@vypbot
vypbot changed the base branch from develop to master October 29, 2026 01:15
@vypbot
vypbot changed the base branch from master to develop October 29, 2026 01:16
@vypbot

vypbot commented Oct 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bugbot: review complete

Current status: No active findings on 2271a6a.

Pull request · Verified commit · Workflow run

@vypbot

vypbot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot approval · Human review needed

Status: A protected workflow, policy, or trust-boundary file changed.
Completed: 1/1 observed checks succeeded; Bugbot complete.
Action required: Ask a human reviewer to decide.
Impact: No new approval is confirmed for this revision.
See checks

Technical evidence

Revision: 2271a6a8e232; base: 4ce75dbd7e32; reason: protected-path.

@vypbot vypbot added size: XL Indicates that the issue or task is extra large in scope and complexity. 70% Progress: 70% labels Oct 29, 2026
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.80%. Comparing base (5b3664f) to head (2271a6a).
⚠️ Report is 53 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #778      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    94.50%   94.80%   +0.30%     
===========================================
  Files         1035     1078      +43     
  Lines        33299    34865    +1566     
  Branches      9824    10357     +533     
===========================================
+ Hits         31468    33054    +1586     
+ Misses         699      682      -17     
+ Partials      1132     1129       -3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/prompts/bugbot.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/tooling/bugbot_benchmark_runner.ts 77.77% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 51 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@efraespada
efraespada merged commit a3ce74c into develop Oct 29, 2026
18 of 19 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In Progress to Done in vypdev Oct 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

70% Progress: 70% size: XL Indicates that the issue or task is extra large in scope and complexity. state:verified

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🐛🧑‍💻 - Bugbot false positive KotlinWasm js parameters are valid generated JavaScript bindings

3 participants