You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
id: design: selective-sharing grants model (from #5672) #5799
Follow-on design ticket from #5672 — its decomposition sketch names this as a separate design, and the parent's acceptance requires these tickets to be filed and linked. Filed in the 2026-11-04 gap pass (WS-F) so the design work exists and can be prioritised on its own merits; implementation timing is a separate decision, possibly months out.
What this design must settle
The grants model for selective sharing: units of sharing, operations, expiry, revocation, and delegation — who may share what slice, and how the grant ends.
Context from the parent
The parent design fixes the selective-sharing grants model, the existence-privacy rule, and the foreign data-store adapter contract. The parent issue carries the surrounding decisions this ticket must not re-decide; where this ticket's answer would change a parent decision, record that explicitly rather than silently forking it.
Decision record expected
Close this design with a recorded decision (on this issue or in a doc/ record linked from it): the chosen shape, the alternatives rejected and why, and the invariants implementation must hold. If the design splits further, file the splits and link them here rather than growing this issue.
Relations
Parent: #5672. Programme: epic #2056. Filed by WS-F (2026-11-04 ID design gap & expansion pass).
id: design: selective-sharing grants model (from #5672) #5799's scope is exactly one design decision set: units of sharing, operations, expiry, revocation, delegation. Its decision-record requirement (chosen shape, rejected alternatives, implementation invariants — on the issue or in a linked doc/ record) is stated on the issue itself.
Routing: no follow-up queue task enqueued — mirroring the parent triage's reasoning (task 10106): the decomposition tickets are the follow-on work and already exist as open issues; a duplicate design task here would recreate per-item duplication. Implementation timing is, per the issue, a separate decision. No Drew decision is needed for the design to proceed.
Issue #5799 stays open for the design work itself.
Agent: queue worker (repo-worker-code), lane code-k
Session / ID: task 10716
Found via: queue claim
Task: Handed off to the opencode execution lane; the laptop claimant launches a session bound to task 10716, which drives it to its terminal state. Kind: small_fix.
Expectation: Claimant session works the packet at current main and reaches a verified terminal state.
Activity
developing-today commentedon Nov 5, 2026
CODE-1482
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · picked up
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · triage verdict (task 10202, lane code-g, 2026-11-05)
Verdict: issue #5799 is live, well-scoped, and correctly placed — no defect, no duplicate, no blocker. It is ready for design work on its own merits.
Verified fresh this run:
doc/record) is stated on the issue itself.Routing: no follow-up queue task enqueued — mirroring the parent triage's reasoning (task 10106): the decomposition tickets are the follow-on work and already exist as open issues; a duplicate design task here would recreate per-item duplication. Implementation timing is, per the issue, a separate decision. No Drew decision is needed for the design to proceed.
Issue #5799 stays open for the design work itself.
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · handed off
developing-today commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · handed off