Skip to content

id(phase-14): Program ecosystem (share, fork, gallery) — core topic (research + design) #6278

Open

Description

@dezren39

Program ecosystem (share, fork, gallery) — Phase 14 core topic (research + design)

Filed from the next-horizons discussion #1240, decided by Drew on 2026-11-05: all themes are planned. This issue is the core topic for Program ecosystem (share, fork, gallery). Its job is research and design — broaden the idea beyond what is already understood, set up multiple next steps, and produce implementation plans. No implementation starts here; the output is design documents and implementation issues.

Drew's principles for everything in Phase 14 (from #1240, 2026-11-05)

  • Local-first is always the goal, AND a hosted version is intended: central coordination supporting a large graph of broadly accessible objects.
  • Anything built must be completely usable by others hosting a small or large server themselves. P2P-hosted worlds and data behave the same as a large hosted public server; differences live in backend scale elements and access controls.
  • Users connect to each other and transfer/interact directly wherever possible, so hosted resources are an offloadable backstop, not a requirement. The app must not technically need us to function. Collaborative / shared / federated / local-first / p2p.
  • Our hosted instance is essentially public; other operators open theirs only as much as they want. Publishing paths: share to a big server, publish on pkarr, or self-host. All comms through iroh on the backend; first-class clients.

The idea, broadened

Programs are the platform's content. Today they are files you have. An ecosystem asks how a program travels: authorship, versioning, signing, forking with attribution, template worlds, install-into-a-world in one click, and updates flowing to installed copies. Broaden with the trust model first (F12.17 provenance is the foundation) and the local-first rule: a gallery is a registry like any other — ours can be public, anyone can run one, and sideloading a .roc file must always work.

Research questions (first pass)

  • Program identity: name + author key + version + content hash; what a fork records
  • Install semantics: pinning vs tracking a channel; what an update may change without world-owner approval (ABI, F12.7)
  • Template worlds: a world snapshot as a starting point — state, programs, roles included or stripped
  • Gallery as registry: same protocol family as world discovery (T2), different object type

Dependencies and existing pieces

Builds on F12.7 ABI (#1064), F12.8 guest SDKs (#1065), F12.9 upgrades (#1066), F12.17 provenance (#1069). Registry protocol shared with the discovery topic.

Next steps — the version ladder

  • v1 — first-iteration design — its own issue, filed in the same pass and linked in the first comment below
  • v2 — outline: gallery & updates — its own issue, filed in the same pass and linked in the first comment below
  • v3 — outline: public gallery — its own issue, filed in the same pass and linked in the first comment below
  • v4 — outline: ecosystem at scale — its own issue, filed in the same pass and linked in the first comment below

Plus a standing rule for this topic: anything the research surfaces that doesn't fit v1–v4 gets its own issue (Drew's rule: every feature, concept, or idea gets an issue), and future investigations are listed as comments here rather than lost.

Sequencing

Design queue order: F12.4 provider registry (#1061) and F12.10 scheduling/quotas (#1067) designs land first; Phase 14 v1 designs then run hosted worlds → discovery → agents spike → the rest. Implementation follows Phase 13. The drop rule applies throughout: anything that proves blocked, wrong, or superseded gets parked or closed with a note — never a silent stall.

Acceptance criteria

  • A research + design output exists for Program ecosystem (share, fork, gallery): design documents broadening the topic beyond the current understanding, per the Phase 14 principles in the body (local-first plus hosted coordination).
  • Multiple concrete next steps are produced as implementation plans / implementation issues filed from this topic.
  • No implementation starts under this issue itself (per its own charter).

Activity

  1. added
    kind/featureNew feature or capability request
    source/humanFiled directly by a human
    priority/lowNice to have; do when convenient
    app/idPackage/app: id (pkgs/ or apps/ in this repo)
    on Nov 5, 2026
  2. developing-today commented on Nov 5, 2026

    @developing-today
    Contributor
  3. added
    effort/lLarge: multi-day or open-ended; expect staged check-ins
    on Nov 5, 2026
  4. dezren39 commented on Nov 6, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    🤖 Agent note · done

  5. added
    task/triageQueue packet kind: verify, reproduce, and route this item
    status/triagedTriaged and routed (see agent note)
    and removed on Nov 6, 2026
  6. added
    meta/enrichedIntake review done: acceptance criteria, links, and normalized labels added
    on Nov 6, 2026
  7. 50 remaining items

  8. developing-today commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @developing-today
    Contributor

    🤖 Agent note · handed off

  9. added
    queue/parkedQueue task is parked (waiting on CI, time, or an event)
    status/parkedDeliberately paused with a recorded resume condition
    and removed
    queue/claimedQueue worker lifecycle state
    on Nov 9, 2026
  10. developing-today commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @developing-today
    Contributor

    \ud83e\udd16 Agent note \u00b7 handed off\n- Agent: repo queue worker, lane code-p (repo-worker-code)\n- Session / ID: cron repo-queue-worker-shift-p run 2026-11-08 18:57 CST; task 13813\n- Found via: claimed task 13813 this shift; execution-lane assignment returned opencode (lane row 5231)\n- Task: Claimed task 13813 (small_fix) for issue #6278 (attempt 2/4). Fresh check: issue #6278 is OPEN. No hard-stop labels (held / user/owned / do-not-merge / do-not-auto-edit) on the target. Handed off to the opencode claimant \u2014 the claimant launches the bound opencode session; this lane does not work it directly. Task 13813 parked 1200s in the same pass.\n- Expectation: claimant session drives task 13813 to a terminal state.\n- Links: task 13813 \u00b7 issue #6278\n

  11. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    🤖 Agent note · handed off

  12. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    🤖 Agent note · task 13813 re-handed off to opencode claimant — FINAL attempt 4/4

  13. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    🤖 Agent note · handed off

  14. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    agent-note:v1
    task 13813 (small_fix, developing-today/code issue #6278 — id Phase-14: program ecosystem research + design) picked up by lane code-l and handed off to the opencode claimant per execution-lane assignment (lane row 5231, assigned_lane=opencode). Fresh check this shift: issue #6278 OPEN, no hard-stop labels. The bound opencode session owns the research + design.

  15. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    agent-note:v1
    event: handed_off
    task: 13813 (repo-health-code-pilot, worker repo-worker-code, lane code-j)
    state: handed off to opencode execution lane (assignment row 5231); parked 1200s pending claimant launch
    fresh evidence: issue #6278 OPEN, labels carry no hard stops (held/user-owned/do-not-merge/do-not-auto-edit absent)
    expectation: opencode claimant launches the bound session and drives task 13813 to a terminal state

  16. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    agent-note:v1
    task: 13813
    lane: code-o
    stage: handed_off
    state: execution lane assigned opencode (lane row 5231); handed off to the opencode claimant per runbook 1b. Fresh check 2026-11-09T06:24:37Z: issue #6278 OPEN, no hard-stop labels; no PRs in packet.
    next: claimant launches the bound opencode session for task 13813 (issue #6278).

  17. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    🤖 Agent note · handed off

  18. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    agent-note:v1
    state: handed-off
    queue: repo-health-code-pilot
    task: 13813 (small_fix, worker repo-worker-code, lane code-e), queue attempts 4/4 AT CAP
    by: repo-worker-code lane code-e
    at: 2026-11-09T07:13:00Z

    Handed off to the opencode execution lane (assigned_lane=opencode via fleet queue lane, lane row 5231). AT-CAP WARNING: task 13813 is at attempts 4/4. Fresh check this shift: issue #6278 OPEN, no hard-stop labels. Packet scope for the claimant session: produce the id Phase-14 program ecosystem (share, fork, gallery) research and design deliverable for issue #6278 per the packet acceptance, or record the precise blocker on issue #6278. This lane does not work task 13813 directly. Parked 1200s to release the claim for claimant binding. Labels already in the parked/assigned set.

  19. dezren39 commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @dezren39
    MemberAuthor

    🤖 Agent note · handed off — task 13813 (small_fix, issue #6278) claimed by lane code-m, execution-lane assignment opencode (lane row 5231). Fresh check: issue #6278 OPEN no hard-stop labels. Handed off to the opencode claimant to drive task 13813 to a terminal state; this lane does not work it directly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    app/idPackage/app: id (pkgs/ or apps/ in this repo)effort/lLarge: multi-day or open-ended; expect staged check-inskind/featureNew feature or capability requestmeta/enrichedIntake review done: acceptance criteria, links, and normalized labels addedpriority/lowNice to have; do when convenientqueue/parkedQueue task is parked (waiting on CI, time, or an event)source/humanFiled directly by a humanstatus/parkedDeliberately paused with a recorded resume conditiontask/triageQueue packet kind: verify, reproduce, and route this itemtriage/real-and-currentTriage verdict: issue is real and current; returned to queue for real workwork/assignedQueue worker lifecycle state

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions