Skip to content

Repeated "Selected model is at capacity" errors interrupting Codex tasks on ChatGPT Pro #41790

Open

Description

@gucheng2020-svg

What issue are you seeing?

I am a ChatGPT Pro user using the latest Codex app.

Starting today, August 31, 2026, Codex has repeatedly shown the following error:

"Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model."

This is happening very frequently during normal agent tasks even though I still have plenty of usage remaining.

In one single task lasting about 15 minutes, I encountered this capacity error 3 times. Codex entered retry backoff (for example, a 117-second retry), resumed briefly, and then hit the same capacity error again.

This severely disrupts long-running Codex workflows. The task was actively editing files and running commands when the model capacity errors occurred.

I have been using ChatGPT Pro during my current subscription period and had essentially never encountered this problem before today. Today it suddenly started happening repeatedly.

This does not appear to be a usage-limit issue. My Pro usage quota is still available.

Please investigate model serving capacity / routing for ChatGPT Pro Codex users.

Screenshot attached showing three "Selected model is at capacity" errors during the same ~15-minute task.

What steps can reproduce the bug?

  1. Open the latest Codex app while signed in with a ChatGPT Pro subscription.
  2. Select the affected model.
  3. Start a normal long-running coding task that edits files and runs commands.
  4. Allow Codex to continue working for several minutes.
  5. During the task, Codex displays:
    "Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model."
  6. Wait for the automatic retry/backoff.
  7. Codex resumes, but the same capacity error occurs again shortly afterward.

In my latest reproduction, the error occurred 3 times within approximately 15 minutes.

Image

What is the expected behavior?

No response

Additional information

No response

Activity

  1. added
    appIssues related to the Codex desktop app
    rate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting
    connectivityIssues involving networking or endpoint connectivity problems (disconnections)
    on Aug 31, 2026
  2. github-actions commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

    Powered by Codex Action

  3. gucheng2020-svg commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @gucheng2020-svg
    Author

    而且,出现 Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model. 后会有一个自动重试的倒计时,这个倒计时会随着出现次数变多,越来越长

  4. gucheng2020-svg commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @gucheng2020-svg
    Author
    Image
  5. gucheng2020-svg commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @gucheng2020-svg
    Author

    25分钟报错8次,绝了

  6. yokinoshitayoki commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @yokinoshitayoki
    Image This happened to me too.
  7. gucheng2020-svg commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @gucheng2020-svg
    Author

    我是今天才碰到,而且太频繁了,动不动就停了,这谁受得了

  8. StarkBotha commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @StarkBotha

    Also experiencing this intermittently, on codex cli Ubuntu. OpenAI status shows no incidents.

  9. Ciscodefran commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @Ciscodefran

    Additional reproduction from another user on 2026-08-31:

    • Codex CLI: 0.151.0
    • Platform: Linux 6.6.87.2-microsoft-standard-WSL2 (x86_64)
    • Selected model: gpt-5.6-sol
    • During an ongoing normal interactive design session, the turn was interrupted with the exact message: Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.
    • The user reports this has happened repeatedly, not as a one-off.

    Expected: transient capacity pressure should be retried without dropping/interruption of the active turn; if retry cannot recover, preserve the turn and provide a resumable failure state.

  10. pokeQAAQ commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @pokeQAAQ

    I've also encountered this, and it's becoming more frequent, especially after the update today

  11. lingkong-q commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @lingkong-q

    I'm the same. What's happening? I just came across it today. I've never seen it before. This really gets in the way of using it.

  12. Water-Run commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @Water-Run

    Can confirm—I’m seeing the same issue very frequently, especially on longer-running tasks. I’m on Pro 20x, and Codex still repeatedly hits the capacity error, stops, and needs another “Continue” before it will resume.

    It has gotten frequent enough that I now keep a separate Grok Build conversation open as an AI provost; whenever “Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.” appears, Grok sends “Continue.”

    It looks like, after Tibo’s resets yesterday and today, he may have to hit the reset button yet again tomorrow.

  13. myklovenyzforever commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @myklovenyzforever

    Additional deduplicated telemetry from a post-reset Pro workload

    I collected additional local Codex telemetry for this issue from the same account on August 31, 2026.

    Audit scope

    • ChatGPT Pro
    • Codex Desktop on Windows
    • weekly usage window refreshed immediately before the measured post-reset period
    • 596 rollout JSONL files scanned
    • 0 read errors
    • full root-thread and descendant/subagent trees included

    To avoid double-counting, I did not count every serialized appearance of the text:

    Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.

    A single subagent failure can appear more than once in local telemetry—for example, in the child rollout, the parent notification, and later wait or close output.

    Instead, I counted only terminal events matching:

    • type = event_msg
    • payload.type = task_complete
    • payload.error.codex_error_info = server_overloaded

    and deduplicated them by turn_id.

    Results

    • 32 unique terminal server_overloaded turns
    • distributed across 16 threads
    • affecting 4 task trees
    • 21 of those events occurred within the three highest-token continuing task trees
    • all 32 events recorded:
      • model: gpt-5.6-sol
      • reasoning effort: max
    • the four selected pre-reset task trees recorded 0 matching terminal server_overloaded events

    The nearest preceding in-thread weekly-usage snapshots associated with the post-reset failures ranged from:

    • 15% used
    • to 55% used

    In other words, approximately 45%–85% of the weekly allowance was still remaining around the observed failures. The events were therefore not caused by weekly-quota exhaustion.

    These were terminal task failures rather than harmless internal retry messages. In several cases, the parent task received an errored subagent status and had to replace or restart the failed work.

    This client-side telemetry cannot determine the backend root cause, but it does establish repeated terminal serving-overload failures for gpt-5.6-sol at max reasoning while substantial Pro weekly usage remained available.

    Could the team investigate model-serving capacity and routing for gpt-5.6-sol, particularly during concurrent long-running Codex task-tree workloads?

    I can provide a sanitized event-level table containing anonymous tree/thread labels, UTC timestamps, model, reasoning effort, error code, and the nearest preceding weekly-usage percentage if useful.

  14. shinstar5 commented on Sep 2, 2026

    @shinstar5

    I’m seeing the same pattern on ChatGPT Plus. The issue first appeared after a long-running Codex task, and afterward GPT-5.6 Sol repeatedly returned “Selected model is at capacity” in both the Codex app and CLI.

    At the time, I still had 92% of my 5-hour usage and 81% of my weekly usage remaining.

    CLI feedback thread: 01a05fcc-d6af-7e70-937c-bbad3def908f

    Possibly related CLI report: #41805

  15. Lio-Green commented on Sep 2, 2026

    @Lio-Green

    I can confirm the same issue in the Codex desktop app on Windows. Multiple interruptions during a long-running task were caused by the exact error:

    Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.

    I also submitted in-app feedback so the occurrence can be correlated with server-side telemetry.

    Feedback ID: 01a05f3e-3c8f-77f0-9528-23bc9b939b5f

  16. ZZZackZhang commented on Sep 6, 2026

    @ZZZackZhang

    Additional GPT-6 Ultra reproduction on macOS / ChatGPT Pro:

    • Codex App: 26.901.41123 (bundled codex-cli 0.153.3)
    • Platform: Darwin 25.6.0 arm64 arm (macOS 26.6.2, build 25G83)
    • Selected model/reasoning: GPT-6 / Ultra
    • Started: 2026-09-05 21:06:08 AEST
    • Failed: 2026-09-06 00:54:07 AEST
    • Recorded duration: 13,679,441 ms (~3h 48m)

    The task had already completed substantial work and the UI showed 24 edited files (+1,249 / -14) when the run terminated with:

    Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.

    Expected: retry with backoff or preserve a resumable failure state so a long-running task can continue on the same model without losing continuity. The task/session identifiers and screenshot are intentionally omitted from this public comment; they can be shared privately through in-app feedback if needed.

  17. Cc0703-D commented on Sep 7, 2026

    @Cc0703-D

    解决了吗

  18. Cc0703-D commented on Sep 7, 2026

    @Cc0703-D

    macOS 上新增 GPT-6 Ultra 复现功能 / ChatGPT Pro:

    • Codex App:(26.901.41123捆绑包codex-cli 0.153.3)
    • 平台:Darwin 25.6.0 arm64 arm(macOS 26.6.2,内部版本 25G83)
    • 选定模型/推理:GPT-6 / Ultra
    • 开始时间:2026年9月5日 21:06:08 澳大利亚东部标准时间
    • 失败:2026年9月6日 00:54:07 澳大利亚东部标准时间
    • 记录时长:13,679,441 毫秒(约 3 小时 48 分钟)

    任务已完成大量工作,用户界面显示已编辑 24 个文件(+1,249 / -14),但运行却终止了,并显示以下信息:

    Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.

    预期结果:采用回退机制进行重试,或保留可恢复的失败状态,以便长时间运行的任务能够在同一模型上继续执行,而不会中断运行。此公开评论中故意省略了任务/会话标识符和屏幕截图;如有需要,可通过应用内反馈私下分享。

    1

  19. shaoke-cpu commented on Sep 10, 2026

    @shaoke-cpu

    Same error since 2026-09-08 on every model, quota mostly unused.
    Key difference from other reports here: a second ChatGPT account on the
    same machine, network, Codex version (0.153.4) and model works fine at

    codex-failed-turns.txt

    the same time, so on my side this is account-scoped, not capacity.

    thread_id: 01a08495-908f-7440-9b82-eac82fdb3619

  20. yangyefd commented on Sep 21, 2026

    @yangyefd

    I am seeing the same intermittent issue on Codex CLI.

    Environment:

    • ChatGPT Pro
    • Model: gpt-5.6-sol
    • Reasoning effort: Medium
    • Weekly usage remaining: 67%
    • Context remaining: 98%

    A previous failing rollout recorded:
    codex_error_info: "server_overloaded"

    I have uploaded diagnostics through Codex feedback.

    Uploaded thread ID:
    01a0c2d5-c569-7e91-a4bd-e7a70359361b

    The issue is intermittent and still occurs with substantial weekly usage remaining.

  21. Water-Run commented on Sep 22, 2026

    @Water-Run

    It started triggering frequently again over the past hour. It may be related to Tibo saying that the limit would be reset, so everyone started working intensively.
    This move by OpenAI is pretty sneaky too—it specifically targets people who make a /goal to the model and then go to sleep... only to wake up and see “Selected model is at capacity”; the task never even started :-o

  22. edwardswhiskeyblues-alt commented on Oct 6, 2026

    @edwardswhiskeyblues-alt

    Additional Windows Codex Desktop reproduction on 2026-10-06.

    Environment / scope:

    • Existing long-running Codex chat on Windows
    • Selected model: gpt-6-sol
    • Reasoning: xhigh
    • The workflow intentionally keeps this model fixed, so this report does not claim that every model is affected.

    Observed failures:

    • 2026-10-06 08:18:31 UTC — failed after 715.128 s
    • 2026-10-06 08:35:27 UTC — failed after 102.429 s
    • 2026-10-06 09:02:47 UTC — failed after 4.373 s
    • 2026-10-06 09:25:20 UTC — failed after 30.028 s, following a deliberately delayed recovery attempt

    Every failed turn returned exactly:

    Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.

    The chat entered a backend systemError state. This is not explained by account quota: ordinary usage remained allowed, weekly usage was 46%, rateLimitReachedType was null, spendControlReached was false, and credits were available. The public OpenAI status page showed no active incident at the time.

    Operationally important detail: some of these turns performed command/tool work before ultimately failing. Therefore, retrying is not safely equivalent to re-running the turn; the client must first reconcile partial side effects to avoid duplicate writes or duplicate external actions. The final delayed attempt likewise began work and completed a command before receiving the same capacity failure.

    This looks consistent with a model-routing/admission-capacity problem that can persist for at least an hour without appearing as a public service incident. It would be helpful if Codex could:

    1. distinguish transient model capacity from account/routing admission failures;
    2. expose a machine-readable failure code in the desktop UI;
    3. preserve and clearly display partial-turn effects before offering Retry; and
    4. use bounded automatic backoff/recovery without re-executing completed tool calls.
  23. whiz-ai-code commented on Oct 13, 2026

    @whiz-ai-code

    Additional Windows Codex Desktop report on 2026-10-13: I am a ChatGPT Pro user and again encountered the exact message Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model. The conversation/task then stopped responding or making progress. This is still recurring. I do not have the exact model, app version, occurrence timestamp, or diagnostic logs available for this report. Please ensure capacity errors leave the active task recoverable and do not strand the desktop conversation in a stuck state.

  24. whiz-ai-code commented on Oct 14, 2026

    @whiz-ai-code

    Additional recurrence observed on 2026-10-14: I encountered the same Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model. message again in Codex Desktop. The attached screenshot shows the exact error text. This continues to interrupt normal use; please keep the active task recoverable after capacity failures.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    appIssues related to the Codex desktop appbugSomething isn't workingconnectivityIssues involving networking or endpoint connectivity problems (disconnections)rate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions