Skip to content

Account-scoped "Selected model is at capacity" on a Pro account since Sept 14 - cross-over test shows it follows the account, not the machine or network #46231

Open

Description

@jim931115-design

Another Pro account with the same account-scoped "Selected model is at capacity" pattern, with a full cross-over test.

Environment

  • ChatGPT Pro (headers: x-codex-plan-type: pro, x-codex-active-limit: premium), weekly allowance untouched at failure time (x-codex-secondary-used-percent: 0), 5-hour window at 63-66%.
  • Codex Desktop 26.908.70816 (Windows 11) and Codex CLI 0.154.0. Also reproduced with codex exec in fresh threads with mcp_servers={}, at low / high / ultra reasoning effort.
  • Models: gpt-6-astra, gpt-5.6-sol, gpt-5.6-luna, gpt-5.6-terra, gpt-5.5 all fail the same way.

Failure rate from the desktop app's own logs (local time UTC+8)

Date Turns Failed
Sept 13 66 0 (0%)
Sept 14 105 48 (45%)
Sept 15 38 6 (15%)
Sept 16 58 31 (53%)
Sept 17 55 (last 24h) 39 (71%)

Almost all failures are Selected model is at capacity; a few are stream disconnected before completion. They return 12-60 s after the turn is submitted. Single-round turns sometimes get through; anything that needs a second sampling round dies.

Cross-over test (this is the account, not the machine or the network)

  1. My account on several different computers: fails on every one of them.
  2. A colleague's ChatGPT account on my computer, same office network, same Codex client: works with zero errors.
  3. Other AI services on my machine work normally at the same time.

Sample failed turns (UTC)

  • 2026-09-17 08:01:07Z gpt-5.6-luna thread 01a0100b-e4ec-77e2-8d52-c6d4c281833f turn 01a0ae60-5f0b-72d3-b445-91196fd9279a
  • 2026-09-17 07:46:00Z gpt-6-astra same thread, turn 01a0ae54-4bcc-7601-9c81-ecd3cefb5723
  • 2026-09-16 13:59:10Z gpt-6-astra thread 01a09bdb-1511-7b43-ae56-2cf8043762fd turn 01a0aa83-2499-7cb0-9a1f-a1a5fd7d368e

Server request IDs from stream disconnected before completion bodies: e6e2469e-ba60-4cd0-afc2-eb666956979a, 0ce20e89-3222-4c04-90a3-2bd0439feb52.

A support ticket was filed and escalated to a specialist on Sept 17 via help.openai.com; no reply yet. status.openai.com shows no Codex incident for any of these days.

Would appreciate an acknowledgment from the Codex team on whether this is an account-level restriction and what clears it.

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething isn't working
    appIssues related to the Codex desktop app
    rate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting
    connectivityIssues involving networking or endpoint connectivity problems (disconnections)
    on Sep 17, 2026
  2. agotfred commented on Sep 17, 2026

    @agotfred

    Same problem, it has been almost unusable today.

    I get disconnects, stuck at "working" forever, stopping in the middle of outputs while still appearing to be working etc. I don't get any "Selected model is at capacity" messages however.

  3. carlosGuimaraes1 commented on Sep 17, 2026

    @carlosGuimaraes1

    I am seeing the same issue on a ChatGPT Pro account with Codex CLI 0.154.0 on Windows.

    I reproduced it with VS Code closed, no CI, no parallel Codex sessions, and only one Codex CLI process running.

    At the time of reproduction, /status showed:

    • Model: gpt-5.6-sol
    • Reasoning: medium
    • Plan: ChatGPT Pro
    • Weekly limit: 100% left
    • Session ID: 01a0b05f-af79-7f41-b4b3-5275eff9d11b

    The failure occurred at:

    2026-09-17T17:18:39.578Z
    (14:18:39 BRT / UTC-3)

    The rollout transcript explicitly records:

    "Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model."

    with:

    "codex_error_info":"server_overloaded"

    codex doctor --json reports:

    • Authentication: OK
    • Installation: OK
    • Provider reachability: OK
    • WebSocket reachability: OK
    • WebSocket handshake: HTTP 101 Switching Protocols
    • Proxy environment variables: none

    I also reproduced the issue with gpt-5.6-luna.

    The behavior is intermittent: a minimal request can succeed, and a few minutes later the same model can fail. Longer coding tasks are especially affected because the task may start normally, use tools/read files, and then fail on a later model call with the same capacity error.

    I submitted diagnostics through Codex /feedback.

    Uploaded feedback thread:
    01a0b06b-7b32-7980-89ed-0ef47e2c63bc

    Affected session with the confirmed server_overloaded event:
    01a0b05f-af79-7f41-b4b3-5275eff9d11b

    This appears very similar to the account-scoped behavior described in this issue.

  4. SeolJiChen commented on Sep 20, 2026

    @SeolJiChen

    I'm experiencing the same issue. It started a few days ago and appears to be account-specific.

    I repeatedly get "Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model." during normal Codex tasks, often followed by long retry/backoff periods (sometimes ~300 seconds).

    At the same time, my Codex usage is being depleted approximately 3–4x faster than before for comparable tasks.

    The issue has persisted for several days while other Codex users I know are not experiencing it.

    Feedback ID: 019ff9bf-31d1-7130-8612-aa2773f172a0

  5. maurovideosmr-wq commented on Sep 21, 2026

    @maurovideosmr-wq

    Consistent with the account-scoped finding, with one refinement from our trace: the routing decision appears to be per-model, not a per-account blanket.

    Same account, same machine, same minutes on 2026-09-21: gpt-6-sol requested → gpt-6-sol served (12/12 correct), while gpt-6-astra requested → gpt-5.6-luna served (196 of 235 completed responses; 2 pairs hard-correlated to local request logs by response ID / turn ID).

    The Astra→Luna substitution state also flipped twice within a single capture session with zero client-side changes: Astra served once at 19:42 UTC, Luna again, Astra served 20:17–20:19 (9 responses), then Luna again through end of capture. That points to server-side dynamic routing following account/model state — nothing on the client, matching your cross-over conclusion. Full tables and response IDs in my comment on #46632.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    appIssues related to the Codex desktop appbugSomething isn't workingconnectivityIssues involving networking or endpoint connectivity problems (disconnections)rate-limitsIssues related to rate limits, quotas, and token usage reporting

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions