Repository navigation
Conversation
release(3.9.3): reconcile master into develop
…cope: clarify deployment queues and managed pointer hashes
…sted-windows-permission-journal-test-exceeds-jest-timeout fix: bugfix intermittent hosted Windows permission journal test exceeds Jest timeout (#577)
…-evitar-cuellos-de-botella-en-ci
…ed-agents-md-hash-scope
…bajo-demanda-para-evitar-cuellos-de-botella-en-ci chore: run RepoWise only on manual dispatch
…ed-agents-md-hash-scope
…supported-pr-configuration-schemas
…-syntax-and-managed-agents-md-hash-scope docs: clarify deployment queues and managed pointer hashes
…mplete-bounded-dead-code-and-history-scans
…supported-pr-configuration-schemas
…e-analysis-and-complete-bounded-dead-code-and-history-scans chore: complete bounded manual RepoWise analysis
…supported-pr-configuration-schemas
…d-recovery-for-unsupported-pr-configuration-schemas fix: diagnose unsupported stored configuration with safe recovery
…lication-callbacks-omit-live-merge-queue-attestations fix: forward live queue attestations on publication
…-without-an-actionable-issue-diagnostic-or-clarification-card
…-reconciliation-with-opaque-provider-unavailable
…ongside-duplicate-semantic-reports: preserve colliding reports and render unknown IDs as code
…retains-an-orphan-unknown-finding-alongside-duplicate-semantic-reports fix: Bugbot reconciliation retains an orphan unknown finding alongside duplicate semantic reports (#655)
|
To preview the documentation for this pull request, visit the following URL:
|
Copilot approval · Human review neededStatus: This pull request is outside the configured approval scope. Technical evidenceRevision: |
|
/copilot findings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Current status: 4 findings originating in this review require attention.
Last reconciled onc9d2749. See aggregate Bugbot status.
🤖 Bugbot review snapshot
Bugbot reported 4 potential problems when commit c9d2749 was analyzed. This snapshot is historical; use the status block above for current state. 4 findings are linked to changed code.
Findings
- medium: Requires a composite post phase that GitHub Actions does not provide —
specs/repository-verification-setup-hooks.md:108 - medium: Untrusted worker output can inject GitHub Action outputs —
src/infrastructure/native_verification_controller.ts:16 - low: Proposed paths can conflict with each other —
src/domain/sdd_draft_consistency.ts:181 - low: Marker mentions in issue text are treated as corrupt configuration —
src/manager/description/configuration_handler.ts:37
Bugbot: 4 findings need attention
Findings |
|
Superseded before production promotion or publication. The operation correctly freezes its prepared source SHA, so the two real review corrections must enter a fresh preparation rather than rewriting this immutable operation. The two verified false positives have evidence replies and resolved threads. The SDD path and literal-marker corrections are prepared with regression tests; the replacement 3.10.0 attempt will retain this review as evidence. |
|
Both actionable findings are now addressed in the accepted production promotion #668 (9e505f5): commit 9e0ee54 rejects incompatible SDD ancestor/descendant proposals and preserves literal configuration-marker mentions without weakening real-state validation. The final candidate passed CI and all three hosted platforms. This superseded PR retains its original immutable source for audit; resolving the historical threads records delivery through the replacement promotion. |
🚀 Production promotion
develop@c055c6crelease/3.10.0@c9d2749masterReady before review
After merge
develop.Compare changes · Release control center
Technical details
Operation
f15937c3-9404-4700-bc68-b94f56cbc5fe; strategyproduction-lineage; merge modeauto.